Translate Page To German Tranlate Page To Spanish Tranlate Page To French Translate Page To Italian Translate Page To Japanese Tranlate Page To Korean Tranlate Page To Portuguese Tranlate Page To Chinese
 

Want More One Way Links? The Cypher Can Help. Why? Because with The Cypher you receive a Lifetime membership for one low price. What does this mean? We will submit your site to 550 directories plus, but thats not all, every 2 weeks we add new directories, and every 2 weeks we will submit your site to those directories at no cost to you. Think about, your one way link marketing campaign on autopilot. It's easy, all you need to do is login into your account to see which directories your sites where submitted to.Learn More...

Home | Legal


In the Public Domain

By: Sam McKenzy

 
 

Copyright protection is largely a transparent issue in film production. It cannot be bypassed in high profile, commercial films; while at the same time it can just as easily be purchased or averted. This is to say that big budget films have the benefit of financial security and, truth be told, solid networking between different artists (i.e. good connections). But then it comes down to the low budget or no budget film, independent or not, copyright protection requires a lot of artistic compromise.

For smaller scale productions, the difference between original and copyrighted content provides for a stark contrast in technical freedom. For example, it may be that the script requests a certain classic song to play during a pitched scene (say, Frank Sinatra). In reality, the script can maintain no status quo, as all elements of production are in constant flux. In this case, that classic Sinatra tune can be attained by purchasing copyright, which can amount to thousands of dollars. If that runs the budget too high, then it must be dropped altogether and replaced with either a cheaper song, or with an original song, specifically written and performed for the script; that would count as original content, with full rights to the artist. This is a blessing for anyone who wants to exhibit their work in a public, distributable arena, as very few legal problems will rear their ugly heads with certified original content. Popular copyright content, however, will cause inevitable confrontations with lawsuits and violations.

Original content requires little hindsight and afterthought. For lack of a better phrase, content created in its original form, with no imitation, is what it is, with no legal attachments. This is why low budget films are better off without licensing fees. Anything else is just excess noise; and artistic merit merits itself even more with original, rather than unoriginal, content.

If that's too high of a challenge (or compromise) to some artists and filmmakers, then there exists the public domain. This is the legal middle ground between copyright and original content. On the one hand content that is public domain was once copyrighted, but now it maintains all the liberties of original content. But that is only one type of public domain. The other is content created specifically to be released openly to the public; essentially ready-made public domain content. Since introduction of Web 2.0 standards, and the popularity of social networking sites, public domain has created a culture all its own. This in turn has generated an increasing amount of ready-made content to be used freely by anyone.

These public domain communities, be it in music or even video, have contributed to the rising demand of content to be used in the endless stream of user-made short films over the last few years. For small scale productions, such a blessing has not been available in the past ten years. And even more revolutionary now is the term 'kopimi,' a wordplay on 'copy me,' which designates content not only as public domain, but proudly public domain.

Article Source: http://myarticlezine.com

Sam McKenzy
construction law

Please Rate this Article

 

Not yet Rated

Click the XML Icon Above to Receive Legal Articles Via RSS!

Powered by Article Dashboard